Jeff's Blog

Tips, Tricks and Thoughts about SolidWorks

Jeff Mirisola



  • View Jeff Mirisola's profile on LinkedIn

Email Jeff

  • Send Jeff an Email

Subscribe

  •  Jeff's Tool Shed
  • Add to Technorati Favorites

Email Newsletter

  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog powered by TypePad

Blogs

  • Southern Plate
  • Anna Wood
  • Ben Eadie
  • Brian McElyea
  • Christine Vrooman
  • Chuck Paulsen
  • Devon Sowell
  • Gabi Jack
  • Jason Raak
  • Josh Mings
  • Lenny Kikstra
  • Lou Gallo
  • Matt Lombard
  • Mike Puckett
  • Phil Way
  • Ricky Jordan
  • Rob Rodriguez
  • Stefan Berlitz
  • Thomas Parel
  • Tim Huff
  • Vince Adams
  • SolidWorks Blog
  • SolidWorks Community
  • SolidWorks Podcasts
  • SolidWorks Roadster

Weblinks

  • Eng-Tips
  • SolidMentor
  • SolidWorks Forum

Podcasts & Videos

  • Lou Gallo
  • SolidWorks Podcasts
  • CADjunky
View Patrick Cook's profile on LinkedIn
See how we're connected

Off-topic Soapbox Rant

A warning: This post will have absolutely nothing to do with SolidWorks, or CAD for that matter.

Why do people feel that part numbers need to represent anything? Too often I've seen "smart" part numbers end up being so convoluted that you need a PhD in cryptography to understand anything. What's bringing this on? I'm ashamed to admit it, but there is such a part numbering system here. It's not as ugly as some I've seen, but it's frustrating nonetheless. Naturally, I tried to get the powers-that-be to see the error of their ways but, in the end, I had to concede. (Today is only my third day, I don't want it to be my last.)

What so many people fail to realize is that a part number is just a placeholder in the MRP system (or whatever inventory control system you're using). The part description is the important part. Yes, I know there are those who are screaming "blasphemer" at me, I don't care. The minute you implement a "smart" part numbering system, you're setting up for future failure. At some point you're going to have a new part that is really similar to an existing part so you'll add some sort of suffix or prefix to its number so you can differentiate between the two. Next thing you know, you've got a third one that's similar to the other two. Another suffix, perhaps? Oops, look, here's a fourth one. Ok, we'll just create another classification, slide the first three over and now we're good. Right? Crap, what to do with the old numbers? Hey look, this part is sort of like the first four, but it's also sort of like these ones over here...
It's enough for me to want to pull my hair out.

Everyone, for the most part, has heard of the KISS principle, right? Keep it simple stupid. A part number should be just that, a stupid number. Whether it's 4-, 5- or 6-digits really depends on your company's needs. How many parts are you dealing with? Let the description take care of telling you what it is: Screw, HHC, 1/4-20 x 1, GR5; Cable, Red, 4 GA; Number, Part, Stupid.

Think about it, no more having to train newbies on how your part numbering system is deciphered. No more having to come up with new codes. Need a new part number, just take the next available one. The world is already confusing enough. Let's not make it worse with "smart" part numbers, ok?

</end rant>

Posted by Jeff Mirisola on February 18, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)

Technorati Tags: KISS, MRP, Part Number

February 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Recent Comments

  • Kerri Dunne on Kerri Dunne - The brains behind SWW
  • Lou Gallo on Kerri Dunne - The brains behind SWW
  • Devon T. Sowell on Off-topic Soapbox Rant
  • Steve Calvert on Off-topic Soapbox Rant
  • fcsuper on Off-topic Soapbox Rant
  • fcsuper on Off-topic Soapbox Rant
  • Brian McElyea on Off-topic Soapbox Rant
  • Gary Hall on Off-topic Soapbox Rant
  • Dale on Dell M4300
  • Steve Calvert on Jeremy Luchini – Mr. Certification

Categories

  • Hardware Review
  • Instructional
  • Personal
  • Rant
  • Software Review
  • SolidWorks Community
  • SolidWorks Tips
  • Web/Tech
  • Weblogs

Recent Posts

  • Kerri Dunne - The brains behind SWW
  • Let's talk about Vuuch
  • Off-topic Soapbox Rant
  • Jeremy Luchini – Mr. Certification
  • SolidWorks World 2009 – The Finale
  • SolidWorks World – The Final Day
  • SolidWorks World – The real Day 1
  • SolidWorks World 2009
  • Flying to Orlando
Add me to your TypePad People list

Archives

  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008

More...